Six Rounds for the Wrong Fight: How Overcomplicated Hiring Processes Repel the Engineers You Actually Need
The technical interview has evolved from a practical assessment into an elaborate performance—one that rewards preparation over capability and endurance over judgment. As companies continue adding rounds, stages, and evaluation criteria to their hiring processes, the evidence that these additions improve outcomes remains thin. What they reliably produce is a filtered candidate pool that skews toward those with the time and incentive to optimize for interviews rather than for the work itself.